Supreme Court voices concern over growing 'menace' of citing AI-generated non-existent judgements

The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement which had no citation in the real world The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement which had no citation in the real world The High Court had…

Key takeaways

Quick scan — what you need to know:

• The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement which had no citation in the real world The High Court had noted in…
• The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement
• which had no citation in the real world The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated
• using ChatGPT, including a judgement which had no citation in the real world

Background

What led here, in plain terms:

• order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement which had no citation in the real world
• Full context often emerges as officials, markets, or courts add updates.

Why it matters

Why readers and decision-makers should care:

• The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement which had no citation in the real world The High Court had noted in…
• The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement
• which had no citation in the real world The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated