The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement which had no citation in the real world The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement which had no citation in the real world The High Court had…
Key takeaways
Quick scan — what you need to know:
- The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement which had no citation in the real world The High Court had noted in…
- The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement
- which had no citation in the real world The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated
- using ChatGPT, including a judgement which had no citation in the real world
Background
What led here, in plain terms:
- order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement which had no citation in the real world
- Full context often emerges as officials, markets, or courts add updates.
Why it matters
Why readers and decision-makers should care:
- The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement which had no citation in the real world The High Court had noted in…
- The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated using ChatGPT, including a judgement
- which had no citation in the real world The High Court had noted in its order that the submissions of the appellant were generated